Johnson Papers Online
  • Search
  • Browse
  • My YDJ
    • Private Groups
  • Resources
    • User Guide
    • FAQ
    • Genres
    • Additional Resources
  • About
    • Overview & Editorial Board
    • Collections
    • Publishers
    • News & Updates
RegisterLog In
Multi Doc Viewing Close
CancelOk

Login Required

A personal account is required to access tags, annotations, bookmarks, and all of the other features associated with the My YDJ.

Username: (email address)
Password:
Forgot password?
Log In
  • Register for a personal YDJ account
  • Need help? Contact us
Not registered?
Register for your My YDJ account
Login
Cancel

Your subscription has expired.

Click here to renew your subscription

Once your subscription is renewed, you will receive a new activation code that must be entered before you can log in again

Close
Next Document > < Previous DocumentReturnReview of Charles Lucas, An Essay on Waters (17...
You must login to do that
Cancel
You must login to do that
Cancel
You must login to do that
Cancel
You must login to do that
Cancel
Save to my libraryClose
Review of Charles Lucas, An Essay on Waters (1756)
-or-
Cancel Save
Print Close
(Max. 10 Pages at a time)


By checking this box, I agree to all terms and conditions governing print and/or download of material from this archive.
CancelPrint
Export Annotation Close
CancelExport
Annotation Close
Cancel
Export Citation Close
CancelExport
Citation Close
Cancel
Close
CancelOk
Report Close
Please provide the text of your complaint for the selected annotation


CancelReport
/ -1
Johnson Papers Online
Back to Search
Works of Samuel Johnson
Back to Search
Table of Contents
  • Audiet Pugnas vitio Parentum / Rara Juventus. Hor: Young men—the few who are left after the crimes of their fathers—will hear of battles. [School and College Latin Exercises]
  • Bonae leges ex malis moribus proveniunt: Good laws spring from bad habits [School and College Latin Exercises]
  • Malos tueri haud tutum: Save a thief from the gallows and he’ll cut your throat [School and College Latin Exercises]
  • Quis enim virtutem amplectitur ipsam Praemia si tollas?: For who embraces virtue herself, if you take away the reward? [School and College Latin Exercises]
  • Adjecere bonae paulo plus artis Athenae: Kind Athens Added a Little More Skill [School and College Latin Exercises]
  • Mea nec Falernae Temperant Vites, neque Formiani Pocula Colles: Neither Falernian vines nor Formian hills mellow my cups [School and College Latin Exercises]
  • Scheme for the Classes of a Grammar School
  • Advertisement for the School at Edial
  • Observations on Common Sense
  • Preface to the 1738 Volume of the Gentleman’s Magazine
  • Letter to the Gentleman's Magazine on Political Journalism
  • Appeal to the Publick
  • To the Reader. [Gentleman’s Magazine]
  • Considerations on the case of Dr T.—s Sermons abridg’d by Mr Cave
  • The Jests of Hierocles
  • Preface to the 1741 Volume of the Gentleman's Magazine
  • Review of An Account of the Conduct of the Dowager Duchess of Marlborough
  • Proposals for Printing, by Subscription, the Two First Volumes of Bibliotheca Harleiana
  • An Account of the Harleian Library
  • Notice in Volume Two of Catalogus Bibliothecae Harleianae
  • Proposals for Printing, by Subscription, the Harleian Miscellany with An Account of this Undertaking
  • Introduction to the Harleian Miscellany: An Essay on the Origin and Importance of Small Tracts and Fugitive Pieces
  • Preface to the 1742 Volume of the Gentleman’s Magazine
  • Dedication for Robert James's Medicinal Dictionary
  • Preface to the 1743 Volume of the Gentleman’s Magazine
  • PROPOSALS For Printing every Fortnight, (Price Sixpence) THE PUBLISHER: CONTAINING MISCELLANIES In PROSE and VERSE. Collected by J. CROKATT, Bookseller.
  • Proposals for Printing Anchitell Grey's Debates
  • Some Remarks on the Progress of Learning Since the Reformation
  • Proposals for Printing by Subscription Hugonis Grotii Adamus Exul
  • Postscript to Lauder’s Essay on Milton’s Use and Imitation of the Moderns
  • A Letter to the Reverend Mr. Douglas
  • Preface to The Preceptor
  • The signification of WORDS how varied
  • Letter Concerning the Benefit Performance of Comus for Milton's Granddaughter
  • Proposals for printing by subscription, Essays in Verse and Prose.
  • Notice of The life of Harriot Stuart
  • Dedication to The Female Quixote
  • Dedication to Memoirs of Maximilian de Bethune, Duke of Sully
  • Dedication to Philander
  • Dedication to The Greek Theatre of Father Brumoy
  • Dedication to Henrietta, 2nd Ed.
  • Proposals for Printing by Subscription The Original Works of Mrs. Charlotte Lennox
  • Letter to the Daily Advertiser concerning James Crokatt
  • Preface to A General Index of the First Twenty Volumes of the Gentleman's Magazine
  • Preface to the 1753 Volume of the Gentleman’s Magazine
  • An Account of an Attempt to Ascertain the Longitude by Sea, by an Exact Theory of the Variation of the Magnetical Needle
  • Dedication and Preface to An Introduction to the Game of Draughts (1756)
  • Dedication to An Introduction to Geometry (1767)
  • Preface to Richard Rolt, A New Dictionary of Trade and Commerce
  • Reflections on the Present State of Literature
  • TO THE PUBLIC
  • Review of John Armstrong, The History of the Island of Minorca (1756)
  • Review of Stephen White, Collateral Bee-Boxes (1756)
  • Review of Thomas Birch, The History of the Royal Society, vols. 1–2 (1756)
  • Review of Arthur Murphy, The Gray’s-Inn Journal, 2 vols. (1756)
  • Review of Joseph Warton, An Essay on the Writings and Genius of Pope (1756)
  • Review of James Hampton, The General History of Polybius (1756)
  • Review of Thomas Blackwell, Memoirs of the Court of Augustus (1753–56)
  • Review of Alexander Russell, The Natural History of Aleppo (1756)
  • Review of Four Letters from Newton to Bentley (1756)
  • Review of William Borlase, Observations on the Islands of Scilly (1756)
  • Review of Archibald Bower, Affidavit (1756); John Douglas, Six Letters and Review of Mr. Bower’s Answer (1757); and John Douglas, Bower and Tillemont Compared (1757)
  • Review of Francis Home, Experiments on Bleaching (1756)
  • Review of Stephen Hales, An Account of a Useful Discovery (1756)
  • Review of Charles Lucas, An Essay on Waters (1756)
  • Review of Robert Keith, A Large New Catalogue of the Bishops (1756)
  • Review of Patrick Browne, The Civil and Natural History of Jamaica (1756)
  • Review of Charles Parkin, An Impartial Account of the Invasion under William Duke of Normandy (1756)
  • Review of A Scheme for Preventing a Further Increase of the National Debt (1756)
  • Review of Conferences and Treaties (1756)
  • Review of Philosophical Transactions (1756)
  • Review of Richard Lovett, The Subtil Medium Prov’d (1756)
  • Review of Benjamin Hoadley and Benjamin Wilson, Observations on a Series of Electrical Experiments (1756)
  • Review of Johann Georg Keyssler, Travels (1756)
  • Review of Elizabeth Harrison, Miscellanies (1756)
  • Review of Jonas Hanway, A Journal of Eight Days Journey (1757)
  • Review of Jonas Hanway, A Journal of Eight Days Journey, Second Edition (1757)
  • Reply to a Letter from Jonas Hanway in the Gazetteer (1757)
  • Review of Samuel Bever, The Cadet (1756)
  • Review of the Test and Con-Test (1756)
  • Review of William Whitehead, Elegies (1757)
  • Review of A Letter to a Gentleman in the Country on the Death of Admiral Byng (1757)
  • Preliminary Discourse in the London Chronicle
  • Advertisement for Francis Barber in the Daily Advertiser
  • "Dedication to John Lindsay, Evangelical History of Our Lord Jesus Christ Harmonized
  • Introduction to the Universal Chronicle (1758)
  • Of the Duty of a Journalist (1758)
  • Advertisement Against Unauthorized Reprints of the Idler (1759)
  • Advertisement for the Public Ledger in the Universal Chronicle (1760)
  • To The Public in the Public Ledger (1760)
  • The Weekly Correspondent Number I [Public Ledger]
  • The Weekly Correspondent Number II [Public Ledger]
  • The Weekly Correspondent Number III [Public Ledger]
  • Preface to J. Elmer, Tables of Weights and Prices
  • From The Italian Library Containing an Account of the Lives and Works of the most valuable authors of Italy (1757)
  • Proposals for Printing by Subscription, Le Poesie di Giuseppe Baretti (1758)
  • Dedication to A Dictionary of the English and Italian Languages (1760)
  • Preface to Easy Phraseology, for the Use of Young Ladies Who Intend to Learn the Colloquial Part of the Italian Language (1775)
  • Advertisement [For The World Displayed]
  • Introduction (1759) [From The World Displayed]
  • Advertisement for Pilgrim's Progress
  • Letter I. [Daily Gazetteer]
  • Letter II. [Daily Gazetteer]
  • Letter III. [Daily Gazetteer]
  • Letter to the Society of Arts (26 February 1760)
  • Letter to the Society of Arts (8 December 1760)
  • Address of the Painter’s, Sculptors, &Architects to George III (1761)
  • Preface to A Catalogue of the Pictures, Sculptures, Models, Drawings, Prints, &c Exhibited by the Society of Artists of Great-Britain at the Great Room in Spring Gardens Charing Cross May the 17th Anno 1762 Being the Third year of their Exhibition (1762)
  • Review of William Tytler, Historical and Critical Enquiry into the Evidence Produced … Against Mary Queen of Scots
  • Contributions to John Kennedy, A Complete System of Astronomical Chronology, Unfolding the Scriptures
  • Proposals and Advertisement [for Anna Williams, Miscellanies in Prose and Verse] (1762)
  • Advertisement [for Anna Williams, Miscellanies in Prose and Verse] (1766)
  • Dedication to Jerusalem Delivered (1763)
  • Dedication to The Works of Metastasio (1767)
  • Dedication to Cyrus: A Tragedy (1768)
  • Review of Oliver Goldsmith, The Traveller
  • Dedication for Thomas Percy, Reliques of Ancient English Poetry
  • 23 Sept. 1765 [Political Writing for Henry Thrale]
  • 1–4 Oct. 1765. [Political Writing for Henry Thrale]
  • 20 Nov. 1765. [Political Writing for Henry Thrale]
  • 19 Dec. 1765. [Political Writing for Henry Thrale]
  • 24 December 1765 [Political Writing for Henry Thrale]
  • 3 March 1768 [Political Writing for Henry Thrale]
  • 8 March 1768 [Political Writing for Henry Thrale]
  • 14 March 1768 [Political Writing for Henry Thrale]
  • 23 March 1768 [Political Writing for Henry Thrale]
  • 23 March 1768 [Political Writing for Henry Thrale]
  • 13 March 1769 [Political Writing for Henry Thrale]
  • 1 October 1774 [Political Writing for Henry Thrale]
  • 4 October 1774 [Political Writing for Henry Thrale]
  • 13 October 1774 [Political Writing for Henry Thrale]
  • 4 September 1780 [Political Writing for Henry Thrale]
  • 4 September 1780 [Political Writing for Henry Thrale]
  • 5 Sept. 1780 [Political Writing for Henry Thrale]
  • Dedication for George Adams, A Treatise Describing and Explaining the Construction and Use of New Celestial and Terrestrial Globes
  • Dedication to John Gwynn, London and Westminster Improved
  • Preface to Alexander MacBean, A Dictionary of Ancient Geography
  • Meditation on a Pudding
  • Hereford Infirmary Appeal
  • Dedication for A General History of Music (1776)
  • From A General History of Music, Vol. II (1782)
  • Dedication to An Account of the Musical Performance . . . in Commemoration of Handel (1785)
  • Advertisement for the Spectator
  • Dedication to Zachary Pearce, A Commentary, with Notes, on the Four Evangelists and the Acts of the Apostles
  • Letter of 16 May 1777
  • The Petition of the Lord Mayor, Aldermen, and Commons of the City of London, in Common Council Assembled, Friday 6 June 1777
  • Letter to Lord Bathurst, the Lord Chancellor, 8 June 1777
  • Letter to William Murray, First Earl of Mansfield, Lord Chief Justice, Wednesday, 11 June 1777
  • Petition of Mrs. Mary Dodd to the Queen
  • Dodd’s Letter to the King, Sunday, 22 June 1777
  • Petition of William Dodd to the King, Monday, 23 June 1777
  • Dodd’s Last Solemn Declaration, Wednesday, 25 June 1777
  • Johnson’s Observations on the Propriety of Pardoning William Dodd, Wednesday, 25 June 1777
  • Introduction and Conclusion to Occasional Papers (1777)
  • Proposal for Printing William Shaw, An Analysis of the Scotch Celtic Language
  • Dedication to Sir Joshua Reynolds, Seven Discourses
  • Preface to Thomas Maurice, Oedipus Tyrannus
  • The Case of Collier v. Flint
  • Translation of Sallust, De Bello Catilinario
  • General Rules of the Essex Head Club
  • On the Character and Duty of an Academick
< Previous document Next document >
© 2023
Review of Charles Lucas, An Essay on Waters (1756)
    • Export Citation
    • Export Annotation

By Johnson, Samuel

Samuel Johnson: Johnson on Demand

Image view
  • Print
  • Save
  • Share
  • Cite
Translation
Translation
/ 5
  • Print
  • Save
  • Share
  • Cite
Review of Charles Lucas, An Essay on Waters (1756)1
An essay on Waters; in three parts, treating of simple waters, of cold medicated waters, of natural Baths. By C. Lucas, M. D.28vo. Millar [1756]
The author of this book is a man well known to the world for his daring defiance of power when he thought it exerted on the side of wrong, the popularity which he obtained, and the violence to which the Irish ministers had recourse, that they might set themselves free from an opponent so restless by his principles, so powerful by his conduct, and so specious by his cause; they drove him from his native country by a proclamation, in which they charged him with crimes of which they never intended to be called to the proof, and oppressed him by methods equally irresistible by guilt and innocence.
Let the man thus driven into exile for having been the friend of his country be received in every other place as a confessor of liberty, and let the tools of power be taught in time that they may rob but cannot impoverish.


Page 341

In the book which we are now to examine is treated one of the most important and general of all physical subjects, the nature and properties of a body justly numbered among the elements, without which neither animal nor vegetable life can subsist.
This subject our author has examined with great diligence, not only by consulting writers, but by numerous and careful experiments, which he has tried upon more mineral springs, than perhaps any single man had ever examined.
But something is always to be wished otherwise than it is. This author has been induced by an affected fondness for analogy and derivation, to disfigure his pages with new modes of spelling, which indeed gives his book a forbidding aspect, and may dispose many to conclude too hastily, that he has very little skill in questions of importance, who has so much leisure to lavish upon trifles.3
Every book, I suppose, is written to be read: the orthographical innovator very little consults his own interest, for I know few faults so likely to drive off the reader as perpetual and glaring affectation.
He that studies singularity, should at least compensate that disgust which his disapprobation of custom naturally produces in all who follow it, by taking a better way than that which he leaves; he that despises the countenance of example should supply its place by the power of truth. But Dr. Lucas’s changes are sometimes wrong upon his own principles, as when he writes soveregne4 and arteficial;5 and sometimes contrary to the laws of analogous derivation, as when he makes lossed the preterite of lose.6
These faults do not lessen the usefulness of his book, though they may diminish the pleasure of perusing it.
After a general account of salts, acid, alkaline and neutral,


Page 342

he comes to his main subject, and gives the following definition of water. . . .7
He confirms every part of this definition by experiments. One of which quoted from Muschenbeck will to many of our readers appear remarkable.8
Take, says he two glass phials of equal size and strength, fill one with Gunpowder, and put one drop of water into the other, stop them, and set them on the fire, that in which the water is put will burst with far the greater noise and force, which shews that the power of rarified water is greater than that of inflamed gunpowder.9
I mean not to deny the position inferred, but do not think that it follows from the experiment. To discuss it fully would require more time than I am willing to bestow upon it. The power of these two bodies must be proportionate to the space to which they can be expanded, which this experiment does not measure, nor indeed does it show the force of either body. The phial filled with Gunpowder was burst by a single particle, the rest was not fired at all, or fired when air had been admitted by the disruption of the glass. The water should burst the glass with more force than the powder I cannot conceive, for the glass was burst in either case at the moment that more power was put in act, than the glass could sustain. So useless are these trials, which an1 elegant writer has lately degraded to their proper rank by the name of bruta experientia, unless theory brings her light to direct their application.
But we shall pass from these speculations to things of daily use. We are taught in the following paragraph to try and select water for the purposes of life. . . .2


Page 343

Dr. Lucas then proceeds to shew the different uses of different waters, which daily experience has taught almost all mankind to choose on common occasions, and which we often are incommoded by not distinguishing for uses that less frequently occur. . . .3
In the following pages is exhibited an exact analysis of the different kinds of water used in London, of which most readers will be more curious to know the result than the process.
Of the Thames water he observes; that “Many have sought, and some spoke of, a spirit to be extracted from the Thames water: it is found liable to ferment and putrify. . . .”4
Of the water of the New River,5 examined with famed care, he determines “That these waters may with safety and propriety be used, wherever a soft water is requisite, for drinking or bathing. . . .”6
He then passes from the culinary or domestic to the medical uses of water, which he explains with great copiousness. As the cold bath is the common form, in which water is applied, we shall conclude the extract of this month with some directions which may promote its success.
“They who accustom their children from earliest infancy, to frequent immersion or washing in cold water, will have the comfort of seeing them grow up vigorous and healthful . . . .”7
On these directions we shall venture the following remarks.
It is incident to physicians, I am afraid, beyond all other men, to mistake subsequence for consequence, to use the fallacious inference post hoc, ergo propter hoc. “The old gentleman,” says Dr. Lucas, that uses the cold bath, “enjoys in return an uninterrupted state of health.”8 This instance does not prove that the cold bath produces health, but only, that it will not always destroy it. He is well with the bath, he would have been well without it. I have known, every man has


Page 344

known, old men scrupulously careful to avoid cold, who enjoyed in return an uninterrupted state of health.
The caution not to bathe with a full stomach is just, though it is violated every summer day without hurt.
The rules about the posture to be used in the bath, and the directions to forbear to speak during the action of the water, are refinements too minute to deserve attention, he is past much hope from baths to whom speech or silence can make any difference.
From the dream of medicating a cold bath, a man may be soon awakened by computing the quantity of salts necessary to increase its coldness and how much more must be added to make any perceptible alteration in its pressure.9
The succeeding parts of Dr. Lucas’s book contain analytical examinations of the waters found in the most celebrated and frequented medicinal springs or baths. In foreign waters, though indeed often visited, but more commonly by voluptuousness or curiosity than sickness, the natives of this island have little interest, and we shall therefore pass over his observations upon them without extract or selection. But our own waters of Bath, to which almost all the wealthy and all the wretched make an annual resort, to which those have recourse to whom baffled physicians prescribe change of place, or exhausted luxury prompts change of pleasure; the baths from which such multitudes expect either ease of pain or increase of happiness, deserve to be considered with particular attention.
Sickness will fly to any place where health is promised, but what should draw the happy and healthy to Bath, it is not easy to discover, since all that Bath can afford preferably to any other place, the luxury of a warm fountain, is polluted by the most brutal grossness, and impeded by the most troublesome inconvenience.


Page 345

The shameful abuse of these celebrated waters must evidently appear upon considering the present method of bathing in Bath. . . .1
Dr. Lucas then proceeds to analyze the waters which have been hitherto universally or almost universally believed to be sulphureous. Lucas has, I believe, irrefragably shewn that whatever else they may contain, they are without sulphur.
Of the sulphureous impregnation two evidences supposed invincible, were produced; one a sulphur, or sulphureous concrete floating on the water; the other, the known practice of making shillings become guineas, or of giving silver a yellow tinge.
Of the sulphur found in the water, this is his account. . . .2
The yellow tincture imparted to silver he has very carefully traced to its true cause, and gives the following history of the process. . . .3
It is of more importance to know what diseases these waters will cure than of what ingredients they are compounded; we shall conclude this extract with the author’s opinion of their virtues. . . .4
Editorial Notes
1 Eddy, no. 16; LM, I.167–68, 225–29, 288–93.
2 Lucas (1711–71), later known as “the Wilkes of Ireland,” made important contributions to “the development of Irish nationalist thought” (ODNB). In 1749, just before the election, the Irish House of Commons determined that his campaign materials were seditious and threatened him with imprisonment. He fled to England, and, after studying medicine on the Continent, was living there in 1756 when in addition to his Essay on Waters he published An Appeal to the Commons and Citizens of London by Charles Lucas, the Last Free Citizen of Dublin, in which he discourses on threats to liberty in the American colonies as well as in Ireland. Boswell quotes the introduction to Johnson’s review as evidence of his “patriotick spirit” (Life, I.311).
3 Cf. SJ’s equally censorious remarks on spelling reform in Dictionary (Yale, XVIII.36, 295). Lucas discusses his orthography as a way of resisting Gallicisms in English and as an aspect of his politics (Essay, pp. xxv–xxxviii).
4 This spelling appears in Part III, p. 47, but it is corrected in the errata list.
5 E.g., pp. 84, 174, 175.
6 E.g., pp. 59, 80, 107.
7 SJ here quotes Essay, pp. 23–24.
8 Pieter Van Musschenbroek (1692–1761), quoted in Dictionary under will, sense 11 (will with a wisp).
9 This is paraphrase of Essay, p. 53. Lucas provides a reference to “M. V. Musschenbroek,” but does not appear to quote him directly.
1 [SJ’s note] Laurentius de Hydrope. [Laurentius Theophilus Luther (b. 1677), author of Dissertatio Inauguralis Medica de Hydrope (1730). SJ suffered from hydrops, now called dropsy.]
2 SJ closed this installment by quoting from Essay, pp. 81–83. The review continues in the next issue (August 15–September 15), I.225.
3 SJ here quotes Essay, pp. 83–88.
4 SJ quotes Essay, pp. 135–36.
5 New River is an artificial waterway that ran, when completed in 1613, between Hertfordshire and Islington in Greater London.
6 SJ quotes Essay, p. 138.
7 SJ here quotes from Essay, pp. 195–99.
8 SJ paraphrases Essay, p. 196.
9 SJ had earlier quoted Lucas’s citation of Musschenbroek’s list of salts to be added to baths in order to cool them and Lucas’s claim that such cooling medicates the water and increases its pressure (LM, I.228). This ends the second installment of SJ’s review. He continues in LM, no. 6 (I.288–93).
1 SJ here quotes Lucas, Part III, pp. 259–63.
2 SJ here quotes Lucas, Part III, p. 273.
3 SJ now quotes Lucas, Part III, pp. 281–83.
4 SJ here selects passages from Lucas, Part III, pp. 333, 335–36, 337–38, and 339–41.
Transcription
/ 0
  • Print
  • Save
  • Share
  • Cite
           
Document Details
Document TitleReview of Charles Lucas, An Essay on Waters (1756)
AuthorJohnson, Samuel
Creation Date1756
Publ. DateN/A
Alt. TitleN/A
Contrib. AuthorJohnson, Samuel
ClassificationSubject: Science; Subject: Distillation; Subject: Ventillation; Subject: Inventions; Genre: Book Review
PrinterN/A
PublisherJ. Richardson
Publ. PlaceLondon
VolumeSamuel Johnson: Johnson on Demand
Tags
Annotations
Bookmarks
Review of Charles Luca...
Copy this link: Hide
Editorial Notes
Copy this link: Hide

  • Yale
  • Terms & Conditions
    |
  • Privacy Policy & Data Protection
    |
  • Contact
    |
  • Accesssibility
    |
  • (C) 2014 Yale University